Is open relationship equal to possessive minimization?

The open relationship, which was first introduced in the United States in 1970, emphasizes that both parties are unreservedly open their information and ideas to each other. From a sexual point of view, they do not agree on the exclusivity of monogamy and romantic relationships or the absolute loyalty of their partner. Both men can have sex with other people on the premise of maintaining their close relationship.
So-called Open relations (Open Relationship), the Relationship between the both sides may have one or more at the same time short or long term partners, such partner may be in the form of short date, or a long-term marriage, and so on. Simply put, neither side agrees with the exclusivity of monogamy or love.
But I have always believed that the two people who can really reach an open relationship must be irreplaceable in each other's hearts. He or she is not necessarily able to satisfy all your desires, but it can give you something that no one else can give you (both mental fit and sexual). So for me, the open relationship is more like an agreement between the two parties that can be "derailed" and a "so what" feeling for each other's infidelity. The confidence that he/she still needs me. The ideal open relationship should be more forceful and unassailable, and there is a sense of destiny between them. "You have sex with another person/someone else but still is my person" is a kind of strong possessive desire! And so as threesome dating. (there is no discussion of purely open relations as an excuse)
content for discussion:
It's good to see President hollande next door. The French are fifty years ahead of the world. Marriage at the present stage in your country is a lot of time is a person to raise do not live oneself must two people, the original survival and economic need, therefore has so many bullshit the marriage room to tear up the dowry. Don't take the time to talk about whether a person's spirit is bound to be based on personality independence.
The western paper tells god, the incense of the east to the ancestors, but love from the beginning to the end is a person's matter, god bless can not, only oneself decide. So it's not about race, it's about gender." It just happened at the moment, and u just happened to be THE ONE. "- to the conclusion that marriage is a social interest of most people an economic contract, the current social welfare and the legal system of your country and the mainstream social values to stay in THE same level (ok) fifty years behind the France N, since there is no corresponding benefits and legal guarantees each independent growth life and die (born out of wedlock registered permanent residence and treatment problems, for example), then don't talk about the open.
As for the French passport, of course you can open it -- since it's all open, what do you want for a marriage? Throuple dating? Back to the beginning of the article chestnuts, career change, life continues, don't even get married also can have children, have finished the son also can still don't get married, this is every one of you or you two questions, regardless of other people's business, people also vote with their feet to say "we agree with you no matter our opinions because we don't want to tube".